Koripallo.com

Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Viestejä
2 568
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Is the NBA Done Drafting International Players?

Hyvä kirjoitus eurooppalaisista NBA-pelaajista ja heidän draftaamisesta taalaliigaan 90-luvulta tähän päivään. Erityisen mielenkiintoinen on teoria, jota esitellään tekstissä, jonka mukaan entisen Jugoslavian alueelta ei juuri tällä hetkellä tule sellaisia superjätkiä kuten ennen siksi, että syntyvyys oli sotien aikana (91-93) olematon.

"There was an overreaction during those years," says Nelson. "We went from having no emphasis on international players, to the '90s when we had the 'Jackie Robinson' years, to bringing in Gasol and Nowitzki and Parker and those guys, and then all of a sudden it went too far."

"In the 90s, you could go to a major European game, with tons of NBA-ready players, and not see a single NBA scout in the building,""And then in the early 2000s, you'd show up to a game somewhere obscure like Austria, and there's six NBA guys in there watching."

"Jason Kapono once told reporters that if he moved to Croatia and changed his name to "Kaponovic," he'd be a lottery pick. Instead, he went in the second round."

"When the breakup of the Soviet Union happened, we told Arvydas that if he cared anything about the future of basketball in his country, he would go back and fuck every chick he could possibly find. And he better not use the blanks — he better use the 7-foot-4 cartridges. Then in 2010, Lithuania would have all this talent. Obviously, he didn't listen, because I don't see any 7-foot-4 kids out there." - Don Nelson


http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8099316/evan-fournier-not-necessarily-surprising-dearth-foreign-prospects-2012-nba-draft
 
Viestejä
9 123
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1200884/1/index.htm

The reinvented Heat faced series deficits against Indiana, Boston and Oklahoma City but went 9--0 after falling behind. In Game 6 of the Eastern Conference finals against the Celtics, James stared down elimination with 45 points, 41 of them in the first three quarters. Before Game 7 he texted Spoelstra about a YouTube video he had seen. The film is of a former tailback at East Carolina named Giavanni Ruffin, running on the beach and on the sidewalk, lifting weights and clearing hurdles. It is standard off-season fare, and that's the point. Over slow guitar strains, a gravel-voiced minister tells the story of a young man who wants to succeed at something: "When you get to the point where all you want to do is be successful as bad as you want to breathe," the minister intones, "then you'll be successful." Spoelstra, a former video coordinator, spliced the tape with Heat footage.

LeBronin ensimmäisestä mestaruudesta, great read.
 
Viestejä
3 106
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

^ Hyvä on, mutta juttu sisältää myös kuolemattoman väitteen "kaikki, jotka ovat viettäneet reilusti aikaa pelaajan x kanssa, voivat todistaa, että kyseessä on sarjan mukavin jätkä".

Mjoo.
 
Viestejä
943
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

hamahakkimies sanoi:

Mainio artikkeli. Kiitos!

Harmittaa vaan kun piti taas hyvään juttuun vetää noi "suoraan high schoolista NBA:han-kritiikki kliseet":
Garnett proved his skeptics wrong, quickly playing big minutes for Minnesota and embarrassing every team that hadn't scouted him. When high schoolers Kobe Bryant and Jermaine O'Neal followed his lead, NBA scouts reluctantly began haunting high school gyms. No one wanted to miss the next Garnett or the next Kobe. And yet … everyone agreed this was heading in the wrong direction.

Ei taida olla mikään sattuma, että asiasta puhuttaessa kaivetaan aina juuri nämä kaksi esimerkkiä perseelleen menneistä keisseistä:

Smith ran the risk of becoming another cautionary tale, someone mentioned in the same sentence as Korleone Young and Leon Smith.

Näitä kahta käytetään, koska muita esimerkkejä ei yksinkertaisesti juuri ole. High Schoolista NBA:han siirtyminenhän sujui pääosin varsin hyvin. Kun kaksi pelaajaa floppaa kunnolla vuosikymmenen aikana, se ei ole paljon. Kuinka monta pilattua uraa ja surullista tarinaa NCAA:han pakottaminen on aiheuttanut? Veikkaisin että paljon enemmän.
 
Viestejä
3 106
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

NCAA-jukkka sanoi:
Näitä kahta käytetään, koska muita esimerkkejä ei yksinkertaisesti juuri ole. High Schoolista NBA:han siirtyminenhän sujui pääosin varsin hyvin.

Kyllä niitä mielestäni löytyy, varsinkin isoja miehiä. Kwame Brown, DeSagana Diop, Eddy Curry, Robert Swift ovat olleet lähes täysiä floppeja suhteessa varausnumeroon. Laituripuolelta löytyy myös Ddudi Ebi ja Darius Miles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_high_school_draftees#List

Toki on kovin kiistanalaista, pitääkö ikihokema "vuosi tai pari yliopistossa olisi tehnyt hänelle hyvää" paikkansa. Monien miesten ura on tyssännyt motivaation tai motoriikan puutteeseen. Loukkaantumisillakin on ollut suuri merkitys. Tiedä sitten, miten näihin asioihin yliopistovuosi tai kaksi vaikuttaisi.

Samaten herää kysymys, oliko noissa Kwame-Curry-aikakauden isoissa lukiolaisjätkissä oikeasti varausnumeron edellyttämää potentiaalia vai oliko varauskiima vain täysin karannut käsistä.
 
Viestejä
943
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Gheorghe sanoi:
Kyllä niitä mielestäni löytyy, varsinkin isoja miehiä. Kwame Brown, DeSagana Diop, Eddy Curry, Robert Swift ovat olleet lähes täysiä floppeja suhteessa varausnumeroon. Laituripuolelta löytyy myös Ddudi Ebi ja Darius Miles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_high_school_draftees#List

Toki on kovin kiistanalaista, pitääkö ikihokema "vuosi tai pari yliopistossa olisi tehnyt hänelle hyvää" paikkansa. Monien miesten ura on tyssännyt motivaation tai motoriikan puutteeseen. Loukkaantumisillakin on ollut suuri merkitys. Tiedä sitten, miten näihin asioihin yliopistovuosi tai kaksi vaikuttaisi.

Samaten herää kysymys, oliko noissa Kwame-Curry-aikakauden isoissa lukiolaisjätkissä oikeasti varausnumeron edellyttämää potentiaalia vai oliko varauskiima vain täysin karannut käsistä.

Nyt tarkoitin hieman eri asiaa. Brown, Curry, Miles, Diop, Swift ovat olleet pettymyksiä, samalla lailla kuin moni NCAA:ssakin pelannut pelaaja joka ei osoittautunut niin hyväksi ammattilaiseksi kuin povattiin. Youngia ja Smithia käytetään esimerkkinä siitä miten mahdollisuus hypätä suoraan NBA:han high schoolista pilasi ahneiden, epäkypsien nuorten uran.
 
Viestejä
943
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Gheorghe sanoi:
Samaten herää kysymys, oliko noissa Kwame-Curry-aikakauden isoissa lukiolaisjätkissä oikeasti varausnumeron edellyttämää potentiaalia vai oliko varauskiima vain täysin karannut käsistä.

Tuossa on varmasti osittain perää, mutta 2001 draftissa oli harvinaisen huonoja collegepelaajia tarjolla. Muistaakseni ainoa josta edes hieman tosissaan (ei kovin tosissaan) puhuttiin potentiaalisena 1-pickinä Washingtoniin oli Shane Battier. Muut korkealla menneet collegepelaajia oli Jason Richardson, Eddie Griffin (huomaa: collegepelaajallekin voi ihan yhtä hyvin käydä huonosti) ja Rodney White (Nimen omaan, collegepelaajatkin floppaavat). Kun high schoolista oli tarjolla kolme kovaa isoa, Chandler, Curry ja Brown, oli riski vähintäänkin perusteltua.

En ole asiaa tutkinut kunnolla (voisi ottaa projektiksi) joten tämä on pelkkä veikkaus, mutta uskon että jos ottaa esim top 10 high school pelaajat vuosikerroista suoraan NBA:han siirtymisen ajalta ja sitä seuraavien collegeen pakottamisen vuosilta, en usko että collegen käyneet entiset top 10 high school pelaajat ovat menestyneet yhtään sen paremmin kuin collegen väliin jättäneet. Samaan tapaan, uskon että korkealla varatut NCAA pelaajat floppaavat suunnilleen yhtä usein.
 
Viestejä
3 106
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

NCAA-jukkka sanoi:
Nyt tarkoitin hieman eri asiaa. Brown, Curry, Miles, Diop, Swift ovat olleet pettymyksiä, samalla lailla kuin moni NCAA:ssakin pelannut pelaaja joka ei osoittautunut niin hyväksi ammattilaiseksi kuin povattiin. Youngia ja Smithia käytetään esimerkkinä siitä miten mahdollisuus hypätä suoraan NBA:han high schoolista pilasi ahneiden, epäkypsien nuorten uran.

Tässä ollaan kyllä jossittelun kovassa ytimessä. Pääkysymys lukio-yliopisto-väittelyssä lienee se, tekeekö vuosi yliopistossa pelaajasta paremman & kypsemmän.

Jos uskotaan Sterniä ja kumppaneita, vuosi-pari yliopistoa olisi tehnyt Kwame Brownista ja Eddy Currysta kypsempiä ja taitavampia pelaajia, jolloin nämä olisivat lunastaneet koko potentiaalinsa. Näiden pelaajien tapauksessahan kyse on ollut suurelta osin myös kuupan kestävyydestä, kuten myös Leon Smithillä. College-ihmiset esittävät myös kuupan kehittyvän opinahjossa. Vastakkaista todistusaineistoa on toki paljon, kuten Eddie Griffin.

Tätä väitettä on tietenkin täysin mahdotonta todistaa suuntaan tai toiseen.
 
Viestejä
3 106
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Ei kirjoituksena mitään ihmellistä, mutta toimii hyvänä muistutuksena siitä, miten kusisista oloista NBA-pelaajat joskus tulevat.

http://www.csnne.com/basketball-boston-celtics/celtics-talk/Long-ago-abuse-and-years-of-repressing-t?blockID=780055&feedID=3352

Keyon Dooling huomasi kesällä, ettei halua jatkaa pelaamista. Samalla mies kärsi henkisen romahduksen, jonka aiheutti lapsena koettu seksuaalinen hyväksikäyttö. Kävi sairaalassakin. Mies oli torjunut asiaan liittyneet traumat koko ammattilaisuransa ajan. Dooling kertoo jutussa, että monet muutkin NBA-pelaajat ovat kertoneet samanlaisista kokemuksista hänelle. Dooling päätti uransa.
 
Viestejä
1 228
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

En tiedä onko kyse varsinaisesti hienosta kirjoituksesta, mutta ihan ansiokas 5-osainen katsaus NBA:n farmijärjestelmän tulevaisuuteen (vain ESPN:n sisäpiiriläisille).

Erityisesti hämmästyttää se, miten vastahakoisia osa joukkueista on investoimaan farmijoukkueeseen, ottaen huomioon että kulut ovat hyvin minimaaliset suhteessa mihinkään muihin NBA-joukkueen menoeriin.

Ja etukäteisvaroituksena hamikselle, viimeisessä osassa on käytetty tilastotiedettä kohtuullisen luovasti.
 
Viestejä
75
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

En tiedä onko kyse varsinaisesti hienosta kirjoituksesta, mutta ihan ansiokas 5-osainen katsaus NBA:n farmijärjestelmän tulevaisuuteen (vain ESPN:n sisäpiiriläisille).
Saiskos tämän artikkelin copy pastettua tänne? Niille joilla ei ole EPSN-insider-tunnuksia
 
Viestejä
7 418
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Sal-serkku sanoi:
Ja etukäteisvaroituksena hamikselle, viimeisessä osassa on käytetty tilastotiedettä kohtuullisen luovasti.
En tiedä, johtuiko se tästä etukäteisvaroituksesta vai tekstin muista ansioista, mutta tällä kertaa en flipannut aivan täysin, vaikka joku jenkki tekikin tilastoille pienimuotoista väkivaltaa aivan artikkelisatsin lopussa.

edit. Toinen selitys henkisen kuperkeikan puuttumiselle on se, että tuon tekstin oli kirjoittanut Basketball-reference.comin Neil Paine, joka on sata kertaa niitä "Wages of Wins"-urpoja skarpimpi!

muggsy sanoi:
Saiskos tämän artikkelin copy pastettua tänne? Niille joilla ei ole EPSN-insider-tunnuksia
En tiedä, mikä on kp.comin virallinen linjaus näiden maksullisten tekstien suoraan kopiointiin, mutta tämä käsilläoleva teksti oli kyllä niin silkkaa asiaa, että olen jopa valmis ottamaan selvää.

Joku valvoja voi halutessaan kommentoida asiaa ja tarvittaessa poistaa seuraavan lainauksen. Muiden kannattaa lukea nopeasti ennen mahdollista poistoa...



Full NBA minor league system?

A move to 30-team, 30-affiliate system for basketball is feasible and very likely

By Bradford Doolittle | Basketball Prospectus

nba_dleague_map_dluc_576.jpg

If the NBA had a minor league system like MLB's, what would it look like? How would it work?

Originally Published: October 1, 2012

Editor's Note: This is the first installment of a five-part series examining the possibility and impact of a full NBA minor league system similar to the model used in Major League Baseball. Today we explore what the "architecture" of such a system would be.

Player development was just not a term you used to hear much in reference to the NBA. The league had a feeder circuit all right, but it was called the NCAA, and it produced a steady supply of three- and four-year college players with relatively polished skill sets and mature bodies. Sure, you'd run across the occasional big man "project" once in a while, or a player would bubble up from the Continental Basketball Association.

Things changed when Kevin Garnett was at the vanguard of the groups we now refer to as preps-to-pros and one-and-done players. These raw, athletic marvels wowed NBA talent evaluators with irresistible upside, but also lugged with them immense risk. For every Garnett there has been a Jonathan Bender. For every Kobe Bryant, there's a Korleone Young.

And after Isiah Thomas swung his personal wrecking ball at the CBA in 2001, it became apparent that there was something missing, a kind of finishing school for players with unbridled ability, or a proving ground for guys scouts missed. The NBA continued to badly swing and miss on young players.

Part of the problem was the difficulty in projecting the growth of 18- and 19-year-olds. But it's also how to develop the skills of a player who has the talent, but not the polish, to earn NBA game time. Only the elite talents such as LeBron James or Kevin Durant are able to sharpen their teeth in big-minute roles in the NBA. Everyone else learns by watching, or they don't learn at all -- until the NBA Developmental League was established.

Push for development
There was an undeniable economic impetus behind the growing importance of the minor league, which of course caught the attention of David Stern. To cite just one example, Bender produced 3.8 win shares, according to Basketball-Reference.com, and for that he was paid nearly $31 million over eight NBA seasons. His first two seasons in the league were in the years immediately prior to the formation of the NBDL, and he played a total of 704 minutes for the Pacers. What if he had played 3,000 minutes for the Roanoke Dazzle? Could the Pacers have recouped some of their considerable investment?

One league official said there "absolutely" would be fewer draft misses if elite talents were allowed to log extended minor league development time, and added that it's going to take time for teams to realize that the expectation level that accompanies high draft picks is less important than a player being allowed to develop on the court in game situations. That's the dynamic Stern sought when he announced an expansion of the NBDL in 2005.

"The absence of a firm-footed, successful development league is something that has gnawed at me over the years," Stern told reporters at the time, adding, "I hope our development league ultimately will be a place where youngsters could be assigned in their early years in the league."

Enter the D-League
Soon thereafter, the NBDL was rebranded as the NBA Development League or, simply, the D-League. Stern moved the D-League's offices to New York and streamlined the operations between the two circuits. Before long, the D-League became a version of the proving ground long envisioned by Stern, with the number of call-ups increasing on an annual basis.

"It's been good for me to see guys like [Lou Amundson and Mike Harris] to find their way into the NBA," says Timberwolves player development assistant Shawn Respert, who spent two years working in D-League offices. "I can say their success has come from some of the things we tried to incorporate in the D-League."

Last season, a record 44 players found their way from the D-League onto an NBA roster.

"We offer the fastest path to the NBA, and I have numbers to back that up," says Dan Reed, the energetic young president of the D-League. Consider Reed's numbers:

• There were 120 players with D-League experience on NBA rosters at the end of last season. That represented 27 percent of all NBA players.

• There were 60 D-League players on playoff rosters.

• Through last season, 166 players have earned call-ups, and including players who have been tabbed more than once, there have been 270 instances of a player being promoted from the D-League.

• More than 30 NBA coaches honed their skills in the D-League, as did one general manager: New Orleans' Dell Demps. Also, every referee hired by the NBA since 2002 has spent time in the D-League.

Reed is quick to cite the D-League's operational integration with the NBA as the factor that no other league in the world can match. The D-League still doesn't pay as well as many foreign leagues, but it's hard to argue Reed's point. The D-League has kicked into high gear over the past couple of seasons, a period in which seven NBA teams have developed single-affiliate relationships with D-League franchises. During the 2012-13 season, 11 NBA teams will have one-on-one affiliations with a D-League franchise, leaving the other 19 teams to share the five remaining franchises.


AP Photo/Pat Sullivan
Houston GM Daryl Morey was the first to establish a hybrid model of a D-League affiliate.
The Houston Rockets became the first team to develop the hybrid model of D-League affiliation, in which they have a dedicated relationship with the Rio Grande Valley Vipers. Rockets GM Daryl Morey and his staff have total control of all basketball operations for the Vipers, but business-side operations remain the domain of the Rio Grande-based ownership of the Vipers.

"You learn about players, learn about coaches and try new ideas," Morey says. "When we looked at the hybrid model, it gave you upside without any of the downside. The minor league team is way more knowledgeable about their market than we are."

That trend will continue, especially given the cost-benefit ratio. When the Celtics announced a single-affiliate relationship with the Maine Red Claws this season, it was reported the overhead will cost Boston around $220,000, or about half the minimum salary of a second-round draft pick.

"We have several other NBA teams interested," Reed says, referring to the trend towards single affiliation.

Stern and his quorum of NBA owners cast a vote for the D-League during the last round of labor negotiations by expanding the relationship between the leagues. Beginning last season, veteran players could be allocated to the D-League, whether to rehab an injury or to work into shape. Starting this season, any player with less than three years of experience can be sent down as many times as his parent club desires. Yet, there is still something missing.

Perception vs. pragmatism
Remember when Hasheem Thabeet was assigned to the D-League in the 2009-10 season? He became the highest-drafted player to be allocated to the minors and it was widely viewed as a demotion.

While some players, such as former Philadelphia 76ers forward Craig Brackins, have actually requested D-League assignments just to get minutes, the stigma of being "sent down" is a paradigm that even Reed admits needs to be overcome. What would help is for a player such as Thabeet -- who put up big numbers in his limited D-League stints -- to use that experience as a springboard toward fulfilling the potential that got him drafted so high in the first place.

"We're still waiting for the unpolished guy to be sent to the D-League and really take off based on his D-League experience," said one league source, who added that he doesn't see Jeremy Lin as an example of that.


AP Photo/Charles Krupa
A player like Tobias Harris (right) might benefit from some D-League time instead of the NBA bench.
For that white whale to be speared, NBA teams need to better use the structure in place. Utah's Enes Kanter played just 13 minutes per night as a rookie, but didn't log any D-League time. Neither did Tobias Harris, who at the age of 19 put up a 14.2 PER in just 479 minutes for the Milwaukee Bucks and got everybody excited about his potential. Yet he spent most of the season watching Mike Dunleavy and Carlos Delfino from the Bucks' bench rather than logging 30 minutes per night for the Fort Wayne Mad Ants.

"We think that in time, it will be the norm rather than the exception for young players to spend developmental time in the D-League," Reed says.

For that to happen, you have to give each team equal access to the league, so we could eventually be looking at a baseball-style architecture. That arrangement might include:

• A dedicated affiliate that has geographic proximity to its NBA parent club. When the Golden State Warriors became the fourth team to purchase a D-League franchise of its own last year, it allowed the established Dakota Wizards to play a final season in Bismarck, N.D., then moved it to nearby Santa Cruz, Calif., for the 2012-13 season. Indeed, all the single-affiliate D-League franchises enjoy geographic proximity to their parent teams.

• Roster exceptions that will allow them to leave players in the D-League for months at a time, or even a full season, without having to summon prospects to fill roster gaps that crop up due to injury spates. This, of course, will have to be collectively bargained.

• Elimination of the current 10-day contract and replaced by a "call-up" system similar to baseball's. The D-League affiliate will be a mixture of prospects and fringe veterans, all of whom are operating identical offensive and defensive schemes with the same terminology of their parent clubs. This will be the pool of talent from which teams get through the inevitable roster shortages caused by an 82-game season.

• A collectively bargained mechanism that protects a team's affiliate players. Currently, even teams with single-affiliate relationships only control allocated players working under NBA contracts. Other players on their affiliates can be snapped up by other NBA teams, a point of contention for those who lose players they've discovered through the acumen of their scouting department.

• A provision to prevent NBA-worthy players from being trapped at that level through draft-and-stash strategies, so you'd see something similar to baseball's Rule V draft.

• An expansion of the NBA draft to three rounds. Currently, you could easily trim the draft back to one round and no one would blink an eye. However, if you have a fully mature affiliate system in place, teams would leap to scout and draft assets that could be evaluated and developed in its own program.

Reed thinks we're clearly headed toward a 30-team, 30-affiliate structure. However, he declined to place a timeline on that process and emphasized the D-League is focused on "steady, sustainable growth over time." So no, we won't see a 14-team expansion of the D-League next year. However, the "true minor league" Stern envisioned seems well underway.

Says Respert: "We absolutely want to make sure that teams have an equal amount of resources to draw from and a factory to be able to produce the things that they need to ensure the success of their franchises."

'Buying' into the farm system

Can NBA minor league teams be profitable? Can player salaries be competitive?

Updated: October 2, 2012, 4:29 PM ET

By Larry Coon | ESPN Insider

nba_g_dleague_576.jpg

Creating too many teams too quickly could tax the talent pool and the D-League's long-term value.

Editor's Note: This is the second installment of a five-part series this week examining the possibility and impact of a full NBA minor league system similar to the model used in Major League Baseball. Today we explore what the financial implications of such a system would be.

What started with a smattering of eight teams in the fall of 2001 has expanded to 16 teams and is the NBA's official minor league -- the NBA Developmental League, or D-League. While many NBA teams have embraced the D-League concept, a few remain skeptical -- and this skepticism needs to be overcome if the D-League is to realize its vision of becoming a true farm system for the NBA.

The NBA has been slow to embrace the concept of a farm system as a place where teams can develop their own talent. From 2001 to 2006, the D-League franchises were all independent -- while they shared an affiliate relationship with NBA teams, the big league clubs had little control over the D-League rosters, coaches or basketball operations. Developing talent for an eventual call-up to the NBA was difficult.

In talking to several NBA team executives, a consistent message emerged about the problems that existed, and the changes that are needed for the D-League to take the next step. At the forefront were teams' rights to the players in whose development they were investing.

"If an NBA team likes a player [on another team's D-League affiliate who is not already under contract to the NBA team], they can sign him," said one team executive. "There is no exclusivity, and no right of first refusal."

The structure of the D-League began to change in 2006, when the Los Angeles Lakers pioneered the concept of a team-owned D-League franchise. By owning its minor league affiliate, the Lakers could install their own coaches and trainers, run their own system and better develop their players -- creating an environment much more akin to a minor league baseball team.

"It's a benefit to NBA coaches when someone is called up [from the D-League], and he is already familiar with the system," said the same executive. "For example the San Antonio Spurs obviously have a certain way of doing things. It helps to have players who already know it."

In 2009 the Houston Rockets and Rio Grande Valley Vipers pioneered a hybrid model, called a single-affiliate partnership. Under this model the D-League team retained independent ownership, while the NBA team (which pays a fee) runs all basketball operations. The D-League team retains responsibility for all business operations, including ticketing and marketing.

Today the 16 D-League teams are a mixture of these three ownership models -- independent, team-owned and single-affiliate. There is one outlier -- the Texas Legends, the D-League affiliate of the Dallas Mavericks, are a single-affiliate team, but are owned by Mavericks general manager Donnie Nelson. (See chart below.)

If the D-League is to become a true minor league system, it might require all 30 NBA teams to have their own affiliate -- either owning their own developmental team, or entering into a single-affiliate partnership with one that is independently owned.

And the shared model has its advocates. "[D-League players are] community property for all NBA teams, and that has advantages too," said one team executive. "Right now the current setup works pretty well for us."

D-League president Dan Reed sees the league evolving toward the farm system model. "We are very rapidly approaching a one-to-one model and a farm system model in our league," he said. "The near-term future is that we expect more and more NBA teams to get involved in managing their own D-League team."

Solvency of affiliates
NBA teams have jumped on the D-League bandwagon in two waves. First were the more progressive teams -- the ones that knew they weren't going to get an immediate return on their investment, but believed the system eventually would figure itself out. The second wave consisted of wealthier teams that were willing to spend after seeing the first wave produce some success.

But to become a true farm system, there will need to be a third wave of teams. The remaining clubs will need to be convinced that there is true value in a D-League investment. A lot of that value derives from the location of the D-League franchise.

"There is value," said one executive whose team has a shared affiliation with an independent D-League team. "But as you study minor league sports in general, you have to understand the city and the lease agreement. Those two things need to make sense."

Another team executive concurred. "Profitability is absolutely, 100 percent dependent on location," he said. "If you have a team like Austin, where there's a major university and tons of people, then yes. But Bakersfield? They need to play in a gym."

Land of opportunity

Full minor leagues could offer players, coaches place to improve and showcase talents

Originally Published: October 3, 2012

By David Thorpe | ESPN Insider

Editor's Note: This is the third installment of a five-part series this week examining the possibility and impact of a full NBA minor league system similar to the model used in Major League Baseball. Today we explore what the impact of such a system would be on player development.

In early September, when New York Knicks legend Patrick Ewing turned down an offer to coach the team's NBA D-League Erie Bayhawks affiliate, there was a hint of indignation.

"Patrick has paid his dues," a source told ESPNNewYork.com's Ian Begley. "He was a little insulted."

Ewing has plenty of NBA assistant coaching experience, accruing eight years of service time on three different staffs -- the Orlando Magic, Houston Rockets and Washington Wizards. And there's no debate his preference to stay in the NBA is deserved.

However, if the NBA D-League were to expand to a 30-team, 30-affiliate model similar to Major League Baseball, effects would be profound. Perhaps aspiring head coaches such as Ewing might view the D-League not as a demotion and feel slighted, but rather as an opportunity to showcase their abilities. Aspiring NBA players wouldn't be the only ones benefiting from a full minor league system; coaching candidates would benefit, too. If handled properly, there is only upside to a full NBA minor league system and dedicated affiliates for each NBA team.

Indeed, hurt feelings are a small price to pay for what could become the most significant aspect of a successful NBA franchise in the future. Here's a look at the myriad of ways a comprehensive minor league system would benefit the NBA product.

Coaching synergy
To determine how players would benefit from a minor league system and dedicated affiliates, one first needs to start from the top, which includes the training and grooming of coaches for those players. A full minor league system would provide a terrific proving ground for young coaches, or older coaches such as Ewing who have long roamed the sidelines as an assistant but still desire to be a head coach.

Being a head coach does not necessarily require more knowledge of the game than being an assistant, but it does demand a different skill set. You need the ability to think quickly, to think ahead, and to inspire players as a unit and as individuals. There are many assistant coaches who have none of those talents (or just one or two of them), and we see proof of that when they take over an NBA team and fail.

However, those are skills that can be improved over time, which is why an NBA franchise with its own dedicated minor league team could ask assistant coaches with head-coaching ambitions to take over the D-League affiliate for a season, or even just a month or two, in order to develop those coaching skills.

Many former head coaches who failed horribly when they were first promoted would have benefited greatly from this. In the NBA, once a coach already has one big failure on his résumé, he might never get a second chance and could be branded permanently as an assistant. I have argued for years that the NBA is in reality a coach's league, not really a player's league. Finding a top coach can cure so many problems, even more than getting a top player (unless perhaps he's an elite superstar, of which there are so few). If an assistant coach had that kind of talent but needed some seasoning first, then both the minor league affiliate that developed the coach and its parent NBA team would be able to reap those rewards for a long time.

Of course, a dedicated minor league affiliate would not only be helpful in developing the coach himself, but in keeping continuity in the offensive and defensive schemes and strategies that would ultimately bubble up to the NBA team.

In theory, both the minor league affiliate and its NBA parent would employ similar strategies with a roster built with the same philosophies (running and trapping, pounding the post, creating shots for wings, using the pinch post, etc.). Having two different staffs working daily on tweaking those strategies would inevitably create designs that would prove to be effective on the NBA team or "varsity squad," even if the "JV" coach came up with the plan. Everything from plays to drills could be experimented with on the minor league team first, where they could incubate, be edited and tweaked into the best form possible before heading up the chain to the NBA team.

Many strategies in basketball are scrapped early in the season because they are failing, but they often fail because of the flawed or differing methods used in teaching them. Those methods, once refined with the minor league team, would then be more likely to work with the NBA players.

Player development
NBA coaches are far more focused on "today," which at the most means the current season, while front-office management must be focused on both today and "tomorrow." In instances when the coaching staff and management aren't on the same page, the debate usually centers on playing time.

For example, last season the Denver Nuggets saw their young big men play a lot of minutes while fighting for a playoff spot, while veteran Chris Andersen sat on the bench most of the time. Andersen was clearly the better option for most of those games, but in a rare case of coaches and management seeing eye to eye, getting young players Timofey Mozgov, Kosta Koufos and Kenneth Faried playoff-caliber minutes and experience was far more important for the team's future than a couple of wins.

Many other young players are not so fortunate. Understandably, teams simply don't feel like they can sacrifice some wins today for more wins tomorrow, that is at least not until they are out of the playoff race.


Rocky Widner/Getty Images
A full minor league system could offer Jimmer Fredette a place to work on his game. Tough to do it on the bench.
However, having a dedicated minor league team affiliate would offer NBA teams a place for players to get valuable game minutes without worrying about the won-loss record. That obvious concern for the win-loss columns is the reason why so many young guys sit the bench -- they are valuable prospects, but they can't help the team enough to be on the court over other players.

Think about if Sacramento Kings guard Jimmer Fredette were allowed to play in a minor league system. As it currently stands, he doesn't play well enough to get NBA court time. It is very difficult to make the adjustment from college to the NBA and try to help his team win, especially when surrounded by so many other young players. If he continues to play with his current style, it's not likely he will be a quality NBA player.

In order to find him the style that best suits him going forward, instead of how he currently plays, he needs to get on the court. In the minor leagues, he could run a team and be the great shooter he projects to be. Perhaps then he could be on a team for a decade or more. To make real progress as a player, you need to first take some steps backward. Failure is a great teacher, in part because it helps define reference points for practice. Fredette could do that if there were a full minor league system.

'Win now' vs. development
As we established earlier, NBA head coaches are usually coaching for today, not tomorrow. Their foresight stretches only from night to night, and they want their players strictly working on what the coach will need in order for them to help win "now." Coaches often do not care about what is best for the player and his overall value over the long haul. They care about doing their job, which is to win games.

To be sure, the more a player can improve his skill level and overall game, the more value he can create for himself and therefore, the more money he can make. It is not uncommon for a coach to see a player working on something, for example, his 3-point shot, and then tell the player that he does not need him to make 3s this season for the team to win, so he should be working on something else. What's a player to do, ignore his coach? Of course, that is not the answer.

Management, however, wants just the opposite, especially with first-round picks and players with multiple years left on their contracts. They want those players constantly working to improve their overall value.

[+] Enlarge
AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez
Jason Kidd still got minutes despite horrible shooting as a rookie. Few are so lucky.
Consider Knicks guard Jason Kidd. Kidd was the Naismith Prep Player of the Year in 1992 coming out of high school and the second-highest-rated player even though he was a terrible perimeter shooter. Nothing changed as he entered the NBA a few years later, and in his first two pro seasons he made just 203 of a whopping 653 3-point shots. But because of his status as a lottery pick, management and coaching gave him the green light to keep shooting and working.

We all know the heights to which his storied career has gone. But what if he were a second-round pick, or even a late first-rounder? Would he have been allowed to miss that much and still keep his job? Almost always, the answer in that situation is no, which is why a minor league affiliate could pay such huge dividends for a franchise. Players would be able to work on their skill game with the minor league team; it also would offer European/African/Asian players a place to adjust to the NBA style of play without risking important wins in a playoff race.

I remember Bill Walton telling me something a few years ago. He said that most big men dedicate so much of their time working on their post skills, spending hours alone as they try to develop a post game. Walton said he chose a different path, one that featured him picking up four friends in his VW Bug and driving from court to court to play five-on-five games. So many big men today would benefit from that advice, as they sit on the bench night after night watching their NBA teammates soak up all those minutes. They need to play to improve, and a dedicated minor league affiliate could be that outlet.

The NBA, and Europe, is filled with raw but talented big men who need only to combine their work in practice with practical game experience to reach their potential as players. From Cole Aldrich to Andre Drummond, sitting on the bench is no solution to any development problem absent a behavior issue. If Detroit decides to let Drummond play significant minutes immediately, the Pistons might get rewarded -- or they might make Drummond lose confidence in his game. And they would likely lose games.

However, a dedicated minor league affiliate that featured Pistons plays and philosophies would help Drummond dramatically improve in short order. The Houston Rockets did similar things with Marcus Morris last season, as he tried to move from power to small forward. Likewise, the Washington Wizards could have spent the past two seasons working with Jordan Crawford and his shot selection. Similarly, Sacramento has a multitalented player in Tyler Honeycutt -- he's good at a lot of things but not great. He would be a perfect minor league candidate.

The fact is, every team has at least one player who would benefit from a more focused minor league experience, one where the NBA team has control of how the program is run and where the focus is on building a player's overall value. That becomes a win-win for both the franchise and the player.
 
Viestejä
7 418
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Diamonds in the rough

Full minor leagues could make draft deeper and unearth another Jeremy Lin

Originally Published: October 4, 2012

By Chad Ford | ESPN Insider

nba_g_lin_sy_576.jpg

The Warriors vow not to let the next Jeremy Lin get away by owning their own D-League affiliate.

Editor's Note: This is the fourth installment of a five-part series this week examining the possibility and impact of a full NBA minor league system similar to the model used in Major League Baseball. Today we explore what impact such a system would have on the NBA draft.

It's December 2010.

Joe Lacob and Pete Gruber had just purchased the Warriors. The team had made the playoffs only once in the past 16 years and Lacob came in determined to change the entire culture of a franchise.

One of Lacob's first acts (before he even officially took over as owner) was to persuade the past ownership team to sign an undrafted free agent, local product Jeremy Lin, to a non-guaranteed contract shortly after the 2010 draft.

Lin, who played high school ball in Palo Alto before going to college at Harvard, was a favorite of Lacob. Warriors fans needed something to cheer for and signing Lin was, if nothing else, a tip of the hat to hardcore fans.

Lacob also completely revamped his management team, bringing in former agent Bob Myers, NBA legend Jerry West and his own son, Kirk, to bolster the front-office credentials.

Myers was a popular choice among NBA people in the know. He was smart, had excellent relationships with the other GMs in the league and knew both the basketball and business side of the game.

West was considered by many to be the best talent evaluator in the NBA. Maybe ever.

Kirk, on the other hand? The newly minted Stanford grad had spent the past several summers doing internships in the NBA. Now that his father owned the Warriors, he was getting his first real job in the NBA. At age 22, he was named the team's director of basketball operations.

His first assignment inside the Warriors was to attend the D-League draft of the Reno Big Horns -- the Warriors' D-League affiliate team.

"It was a cool experience," Kirk Lacob recalled. "It was the first draft I'd ever been part of. Eric Musselman [Reno's head coach at the time] started guiding us through what the D-League could be. I got a comfort level with it. We started talking about how useful the D-League could be to us in terms of player development."

Seventeen games into his rookie season, Lin was averaging 1.9 ppg in 8.5 mpg. The Warriors loved his talent. But the transition from the Ivy League to the NBA was proving a little too much.

The Warriors decided to give Lin a chance to play in Reno.

"With an asset like Jeremy, we thought it would be a great fit," Lacob said. "He could get the playing time he needed and we could develop a player we truly liked."


With an asset like Jeremy, we thought it would be a great fit. He could get the playing time he needed and we could develop a player we truly liked.

-- Kirk Lacob, Golden State Warriors assistant general manager
Lin might have thought at the time he was being demoted. But in reality, the seeds of Linsanity were being sowed. He scored 10 points in his first game. He had 21 points in 20 minutes in his second one. By his fourth game, he was good enough that the Warriors recalled him to the major leagues.

Lin immediately went on the inactive list, however, and by January he was back with Reno -- scoring points and landing a spot on the D-League Showcase first team. In 20 games, he averaged 20.4 ppg. The Warriors recalled him again in February, but again, Lin played sparingly.

Both Lin and the Warriors credited the D-League experience with helping Lin regain his swagger. But with the team trying to win now, the playing time just wasn't going to be there. A new head coach and the NBA lockout combined with an ill-fated attempt to land restricted free agent DeAndre Jordan ended Lin's run in Golden State.

The team waived him on the first day of training camp to make cap room for an offer on Jordan before Lin had a chance to play for new head coach Mark Jackson. It turned out to be a mistake for the Warriors.

One they are counting on never happening again.

"Jeremy benefited from his time in Reno," Lacob said. "But we began to understand that for the D-League to really work for us, things needed to change. We wanted more more control. We wanted to be able to control who the players around Jeremy were. The type of system he was playing in. His playing time. It worked out for Jeremy, but we needed to find a way for it to work for us, too."

After exploring a number of different options, the Warriors decided that the only real way to turn a D-League team into a true farm team was to completely own the team and eventually move it close to home.

At the time, only four teams, the San Antonio Spurs, Oklahoma City Thunder, Dallas Mavericks and Houston Rockets, owned their D-League teams. All are showing various forms of success with it. The Warriors intend to take their sole ownership even further.

"If we can control every aspect, we can try out different things for player development," Myers said. "We can develop coaches, front-office staff, ticket sales. We wanted to own everything."

This perspective is important to keep in mind, because when the Santa Cruz Warriors step foot on their home court for the first time on Dec. 23, they might be providing us with a glimpse into the future of the NBA.

And understanding how an old IBA team from North Dakota landed in Santa Cruz, Calif., illuminates the path that more and more NBA teams are embracing as they look for anything that might give them a competitive edge over the other 29 teams in the NBA.

Owning the farm team
On June 28, 2011, the Warriors bought the Dakota Wizards for roughly the cost of a first-round draft pick. Joe Lacob tapped Jim Weyermann, a minor league baseball guru and former president of the Class-A San Jose Giants, to be the president of the team. Weyermann's job was to teach the Warriors everything he knew about how to make a successful farm team and to find a spot for the Wizards to relocate to Bay Area.

Kirk Lacob was promoted to assistant GM of the Warriors and concurrently as GM of the Wizards. His task was to find a way to integrate what the Warriors were doing in Oakland with what the Wizards were doing in North Dakota.

They wanted better communication between GMs, coaches and scouting staffs. They wanted to make two separate organizations one with a goal of improving player development.

Kirk Lacob, who also embraces sports analytic models, says that their research is clear. The Warriors can get a competitive advantage and a huge return on their investment if they put more effort into player scouting and development.

"If you draft a player in the top five, he's got a great chance of sticking in the league. If a player is drafted between six and eight he still has a pretty good chance. But after that, players drafted between nine and 30 have barely a better chance of sticking in the league than second-round picks.

"It's shocking really," Lacob said. "We want to improve our chances and we think the best teams do that through player development. If we can increase our young players' chances of making the league from say 12 percent to 25 percent, it will be worth the investment."

[+] Enlarge
Jerome Miron/US Presswire
Perhaps given time to develop skills in Golden State's system, Jeremy Tyler (left) is now their starting center.
In their inaugural year, the Wizards were a bit of a testing ground. The Warriors sent Jeremy Tyler there for a stint and developed an undrafted player they liked, Edwin Ubiles.

Tyler is the poster child for the need of a NBA farm system. Tyler left the United States after his junior year in high school to play pro ball in Israel. Despite his natural talents, he wasn't ready for the leap and his stint in Israel ended in disaster. The next year he spent in Tokyo playing against inferior competition. By the time of the NBA draft in 2011, every team in the NBA was afraid of Tyler. He had the size and athletic ability to be a NBA star. But he was incredibly raw and there were serious questions about his maturity and his work ethic.

Despite lottery type talent, Tyler slid to the 39th pick. The Warriors felt if they had the space to develop him, he might be worth the risk.

"When you are drafting a player, especially in the second round, you know there's a good chance he won't get playing time," Lacob said. "And if he does, he won't be confident trying to expand or improve his game. He's always looking over his shoulder, afraid to make a mistake.

"However, with a D-League team in place where you control all of the elements -- it increases your ability to take risks on kids who aren't ready for the NBA but could be someday.

"We had all the same information everyone else did on Tyler before the draft. We had our reservations. We had heard the same stories. We learned everything we could. The difference for us is that we thought we had a player development process in place to let him succeed. And if he developed, he could help us."

In February the Warriors put their experiment to the test. They sent Tyler, who was playing sparingly, to North Dakota to get him some confidence.

"He didn't get to go to college. The situation he was in for the last two years wasn't ideal," Lacob said. "He wasn't playing for us. He was working hard with the team. We had him working on a little jump hook and things. But it's hard to be a better player without playing time. He got a chance to do that in the D-League."

Tyler played a total of five games for the Wizards. He averaged 15.6 ppg, 7.8 rpg and shot 59 percent from the field in 30 mpg. By the end of the season, he was the Warriors' starting center and averaging 12 ppg and 8 rpg.

Whether Tyler's increased playing time is a testament to Tyler's development or the Warriors' nose dive at the end of the season is debatable. But the real test is coming this season. In May, the team began the process of moving the Wizards to Santa Cruz -- and renaming them the Warriors -- for the 2012-13 season.

With the D-League team only 75 miles away, and a new CBA rule in place that allows teams to make unlimited assignments to the D-League for the first three years of a player's career -- the Warriors have big plans.

"When you own your own team and it's close to you, it opens up a lot of options," Myers said. "A rookie can practice with the team in the morning, drive down to Santa Cruz and play 30 or 40 minutes in a D-League game and be back the next morning for practice with the team. It gives us the ability to keep a player close, keep them surrounded by our coaches and players, and still give them a chance to go get significant playing time. Since our D-League coaches are just an extension of our NBA coaches, we run the same system, we are on the same page and our ultimate goal isn't just to win D-League games, but to develop players. It opens up a significant opportunities for us."

Protecting the investment
As more teams embrace the concept, and as the NBA and Players Association change the rules to accommodate teams such as the Warriors, it opens up a whole new world for the draft, rookie contracts and how the league scouts.

If teams own their minor league team, they will want to own the rights to more young players. To make that happen in a way that works for both the teams and the players, new forms of contracts will have to be developed.

Currently players drafted in the first round are on rookie scale contracts. Second-rounders have to sign for at least $500,000 -- the league minimum. Once signed, teams own the players' rights for the duration of the contract.

[+] Enlarge
Joe Robbins/Getty Images
The Warriors nearly lost Edwin Ubiles to the Washington Wizards.
D-League contracts, on the other hand, have a starting salary that tops out at around $25,000. Players can be called up by any team in the league if a player is on a D-League contract. That's how the Warriors almost lost a promising young prospect, Ubiles, when the Washington Wizards signed him to a 10-day contract in March. Ubiles' contract ended after that 10-day stint, and he returned to the Dakota Wizards. But had Washington kept him, Golden State would've lost out.

A number of GMs said that at some point, a middle ground will have to be made for teams that want to retain the rights to their D-League players without breaking the bank. Some are calling for two-way contracts that allow teams to own the rights of D-League players at cost of say, $100,000 per year. It's a big pay raise for some D-Leaguers, but it protects teams that want to invest in the development of players outside their regular 15-man roster.

"For this system to work, there has to be a reason to invest in players," Myers said. "We have to protect the investment. If a couple of teams don't take the lead, then the teams who doubt it won't join in."

Changes to the draft?
Sole ownership of a D-League team could lead to teams being more aggressive in picking up second-round picks, for example. It might convince even more underclassmen to leave college early (or skip it altogether) to develop a relationship and a training regime with a particular team, increasing the depth of drafts. It might even lead to the NBA draft expanding a round or two.

In the first two rounds of the NBA draft, teams typically end up focusing on drafting players who are either elite talents or who can help you right now. If you added a third round, an idea that the Warriors say they are in favor of, teams could use it as a developmental round where they target players who aren't ready, but could be someday.

It might also begin to change the way teams scout. Currently, NBA teams keep a database of between 100 and 150 players that they actively scout. The goal on draft night is to narrow that list to 60 players. The leftovers are for summer league squads or training camp rosters. But with a viable farm team in place, it might force scouts to assess talent a little differently.

"It gives you a broader perspective," Lacob said. "You may like a guy from the Summit League, but you feel like the gap between the competition is just too great for him to overcome in a short period of time. With a good D-League system in place, you can send them there to learn your system, play against better competition and to get their confidence up. In a year, you might have a guy like Lin, who couldn't just make the leap from Harvard to the NBA. He just needed some time to adjust and get his confidence. I think it opens up a lot of possibilities, especially for some of the players from smaller schools who have the talent, but need the time to adjust."

Leveling the playing field?
Overall, sole ownership of a D-League team embraces the idea that for teams, especially small-market ones, to compete with the big markets, they have to get smarter about how they handle their most valuable resources -- young players.

Not everyone is in. In fact, a number of the GMs and scouts I spoke with in the league have barely given it much thought. Many believe there just isn't that much talent out there and don't believe the effort of running and coordinating a farm team is worth the return in a league that has only 15 roster spots.

"Look, there are about three to four team-changing players in every draft," said one NBA GM who wanted to remain anonymous. "Maybe another five or six are role players. Everyone is mining the same rock. Everyone is after the same diamonds. Throwing a bunch of money at a D-League team isn't really going to change things with the draft or the NBA. God bless them. They're young and think they can reinvent something. I've been around the block a few times. Been around this one, too. I think they'll end up where they began. Jeremy Lin is an outlier. He's not the norm."

Perhaps. But the Warriors think they have seen the future and are embracing it with open arms.

"We are all-in," Myers said. "The negative stigma surrounding the D-League is evaporating. Agents and players want to play in it. Most of the successful organizations in the NBA have developed their own players. Knowing you have a team you own in close proximity; knowing that you can control the culture, the coaching and the system -- it's a big positive. You don't get better playing basketball unless you play."

Just ask Jeremy Lin.

What kind of talent is out there?

Full farm system improves quality of fringe players but doesn't create stars

Originally Published: October 5, 2012

By Neil Paine | Basketball-Reference.com

nba_g_patterson1_sy_576.jpg

A full farm system won't create a lot of stars, but it could improve the quality of marginal players.

Editor's Note: This is the final installment of a five-part series this week examining the possibility and impact of a full NBA minor league system similar to the model used in Major League Baseball. Today we explore the quality of players such a system might produce.

When Branch Rickey, the St. Louis Cardinals' ever-forward-thinking general manager, developed Major League Baseball's first farm system in the late 1920s, it revolutionized the process by which young talent was funneled from the amateur ranks to the game's highest level. And after seeing St. Louis win five pennants and three World Series titles from 1926 to 1934, the rest of baseball soon borrowed Rickey's innovation for themselves, leading to a formalized network of minor league affiliate teams that persists more or less unchanged to this day.

Meanwhile, for all of its innovations and global reach, professional basketball hasn't really embraced the minor league concept and taken it to its full extent the way baseball did nearly a century ago. Many of the reasons for this disparity have to do with structural differences between baseball and basketball, and we've tried to outline those throughout this week's series, but one fundamental similarity between the two sports is the nature of talent distribution in an increasingly international pool of potential players.

Depending on how you classify the lowest divisions of semipro basketball in countries like Spain, there are -- by my count -- approximately 15,000 professional basketball players worldwide in countries that sent players to the NBA over the last few seasons. If we assume absolute basketball talent is normally distributed across that entire pool of players, you could picture the pro basketball universe as one big bell-shaped curve that includes players from, say, third- and fourth-tier European leagues in the distribution's left tail, players from better leagues like the Australian NBL toward the middle, and the cream of the crop (the Spanish Liga ACB, for instance) along the right tail of the graph.

Zoom in on the furthest right-hand tail of the curve, and you see the NBA. Assuming our recent #NBArank player ratings created a decent list of the top 500 players in the world at the moment, NBA teams are looking at players who are between four standard deviations (No. 1-ranked LeBron James) and roughly 1.9 standard deviations better than the average pro basketball player worldwide.

Even 500th-ranked Eddy Curry, whose #NBArank score of 1.21 suggests he's just 1.7 standard deviations above the professional mean, is in the 95th percentile of pro basketball players on the planet. The far right side of our worldwide talent curve is truly a special place to be.

On one hand, this means the utility of a full, dedicated NBA minor league system is inherently limited. The average player on the cusp of the league's replacement level (#NBArank Nos. 390-450) scored a 2.4 on our experts' 0-10 scale, while the average of the next 30 players -- the players likely to be recalled to the NBA from any minor league system -- is 2.0. That's not a major drop-off, but it's also not a vote of confidence that the minors would contain much of anything beyond the kind of roster filler we see floating around the league on 10-day contracts today.

That basic reality, of course, reflects a key tenet of the wins above replacement (WAR) theory that grew out of baseball's sabermetric revolution: While the worldwide distribution of player talent is approximately normal, at the game's highest level it is decidedly not. Instead, it looks more like a pyramid, with a small number of great players stacked above a larger number of good players, who in turn sit above an even larger amount of mediocre-but-useful talent, the entire lot of which lies on top of a nearly endless supply of anonymous, replacement-level scrubs.

Our theoretical NBA minor league system would be composed mostly of players whose #NBArank grades don't even crack 1.0 (and are probably close to 0.0 for the vast majority of players).

This kind of broad perspective on the pro basketball talent curve has its value, particularly in visualizing the fungibility of players at the NBA's fringe, but any discussion of such generalities necessarily assumes perfect information on the part of the league's talent evaluators and decision-makers.


Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images
Is Eddy Curry better than 95 percent of the rest of the world's pro basketball talent? Really?
For the most part, NBA scouts and executives do a good job of assessing the skills and potential utility of their players, but as we saw with someone like Jeremy Lin last season, they are not infallible. Lin infamously received an #NBArank grade of 1.88 prior to the 2011-12 campaign, a number that was upgraded to 5.95 for this year's edition of the rankings.

Not all #NBArank grades are subject to such huge error terms. For the average player who appeared on both the 2011 and 2012 lists, you could be 95 percent certain that his 2012 grade would fall between +/- 0.1 points of a regressed-to-the-mean version of his 2011 score. However, since for our purposes we're talking about players at the margins of the #NBArank grading spectrum (far from the comfort of the mean), the confidence intervals are wider.

In the case of someone who, like Lin, was in the 1.9 range, we'd predict his "true" rating to be anywhere between 2.18 and 2.44. That kind of a distinction doesn't sound incredibly important, but recall that those numbers correspond almost perfectly to the difference between the fringe player who does actually deserve a place on an NBA roster and one who shouldn't really be in the league.

Most likely, this type of improvement at the NBA roster's margins is the kind of advantage a dedicated minor league would be able to provide. While highly touted draft picks would rarely be banished to the NBA team's affiliate -- unless it were for discipline, culture adjustment or applying finishing polish to his game -- such a system would give teams a place to stash less-heralded project players, on whose true talent levels scouts mentally place wide "confidence intervals."

In other words, the more game action these prospects see, the more information talent evaluators can gather to help narrow their opinions on the players' ranges of future outcomes.

Make no mistake, cases like Jeremy Lin are extraordinarily rare. Most players whose initial grades are low stay that way, in no small part because the overwhelming majority of professional basketball players on Earth deserve #NBArank grades at or around 0.0. But even though so much of the worldwide distribution of basketball talent sits to the left of the NBA's bright replacement-level line, the fungible nature of fringe players makes a readily available pool of near-NBA-caliber players an attractive possibility -- especially considering that those are the types of players whose true ability levels GMs and scouts should have the least amount of confidence about.
 
Viestejä
7 418
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

Suosittelen muuten lämpimästi hankkimaan nuo tunnarit itselleen. Eivät maksa mielettömästi (jos ottaa kerralla parin vuoden diilin) ja ovat ainakin omasta mielestäni olleet koko rahan arvoisia. (Lisäksi en kyllä jatkossa hirveästi jaksa näitä kopiointeja suorittaa. Ei ole nimittäin suoraviivaista kopioida tekstiä monimutkaisesti muokatulta nettisivulta.)
 
Viestejä
75
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

kaikki osat löytyivät pienellä googlauksella jenkkiforumeilta "ilmaiseksi"
 
Viestejä
7 418
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

muggsy sanoi:
kaikki osat löytyivät pienellä googlauksella jenkkiforumeilta "ilmaiseksi"
Ok. Tästä voi varmaankin päätellä, että kyseessä on ns. maailman tapa?

(Eipä kestä. Copy-pasteilu sen sijaan kesti tovin poikineen.)
 

L.S

Viestejä
832
Vs: Hienot NBA-kirjoitukset

kiitosta vaan vaivannäöstä, oli oikeen mielenkiintosta luettavaa.
 
Jotta voit kirjoittaa viestejä, sinun täytyy rekisteröityä foorumille. Rekisteröityminen on ilmaista, helppoa ja nopeaa. Rekisteröidy tästä.
Ylös